In reply to this post.
A route is a path. There are two routes in philosophy.
What are the two routes? I read to the end. lol. Good read, by the way.
A route, is also a retreat.
By “retreat” you mean a route of escaping from what? This is a metaphor that assumes something to escape from. I am not sure what yet.
One either has faith, or one doubts. But often enough, people think they are not having faith when they are doubting. But most often through their doubting they are really just upholding faith.
“… faith … doubt” Let us be clear here. Are we assuming just the Christian faith and Christian doubt? Or are we talk about all faiths, Judeo-Christian, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Jainism and the other thousands of religions out there and therefore all doubts?
Faith is that which is already informing one to what they can possibly know.
Is it only Faith that informs? Can another faith inform? Can a non-faith inform?
‘…know …’ I am assuming Faith also means all that is to be Known in the widest possible sense, inside and outside the reality.
The operation of faith is based in offense. In our modern times, the basic offense of what we can call conventional philosophy is known as contradiction.
What is the non-conventional philosophy that we are hinting at here?
In this way, the modern religion is based in A foundational theological tenant that we call reason.
You are not talking of any religion other than Christianity, are you?
Reason upholds the modern faith in reality by rejecting contradiction. Modern identity is founded in moving the other direction once contradiction is found. Contradiction defines the limit of subjectivity.
We need to define reason and contradiction clearer here. I don’t know if we are holding on to the same definitions for these.
We call a known thing which has parameters, and object.
I will go with this. But I am not sure again, if your ‘know’ is the same notion as my ‘know’.
If we can define one parameter, we have found the beginning of an object, …
An object has not begun, then, until it is defined by a parameter. Until that moment the object does not exist.
… because all we need is one fact of an object and that necessarily leads to all the facts which constitute an object.
Fact equals truth? What is a fact?
All of the facts are what is knowable.
Because we know that the subject of reason rejects contradiction, we know one parameter of the modern subject.
What is the definition of subject? I honestly do not know the meaning of subject in this context.
Because we know one parameter, one fact of subjectivity, one true thing which establishes the modern subject in the real world, we likewise know that subjectivity is an object that we can know.
The difficulty in understanding this kind of knowledge is founded in a theological tenant that we know as philosophical phenomenalism, or what we could call the phenomenal subject. The modern subject becomes fully defined once the postmodern Version of phenomenalism arises.
When we see that the postmodern subject is really the completion of the modern theological subject, then we have all the information we need to begin to understand the object of the subject.
You have lost me here. But I may be lost because I do not have a theological tenant s my starting point. And also our uses of modernism/postmodernism is likely different, both idiosyncratic in their own ways.
The two routes is the way that we understand a subject, as an object.
Again, are the two routes taken by one person or taken by two people.
It doesn’t matter what one believes about a situation. …
I am glad to hear that … but it seems to me that you are continually projecting a faith and doubt onto me that I do not have, a kind of “Poor fella. He doesn’t know it but God will Save him.” You may feel the same of me, that I am projecting an emptiness or a nihilism that you do not want.
… What we find of the subject, by its parameters, is true, despite subjective knowledge. Because only subjectivity concerns belief, and belief is that by which subjectivity is upheld in faith.
Language, or an orientation upon discourse in particular, is the means by which the theology of the subject Upholds the modern religious faith. Faith is that which grants reality, because it is operating to inform us what we are able to think and know.
I don’t know if we have the same notion of language also. For in the beginning wasn’t the word. It wasn’t with God. and it certainly wasn’t God.
I am not misquoting this because I want to poke fun at Christianity, but because I feel that language like this misleads. By Word=God we have no escape (retreat, if you will) from the narrative, the discourse.
Philosophy arises in simultaneity as a thrust forward, and as a retreat. The view which sees a choice in how to proceed, is always a move forward, a real move. Hence the reason which finds truth is retreating.
I highly recommend Metaphors We Live By as a route to understand how metaphors like this work. Lakoff would label this an [X IS WAR.] conceptual metaphor.