Lance: “Of course. All things unify within a universe. That’s what a universe is.”

I understand. It is unitive only as a object in your mind as an intentional universe. The physical universe as object, however, is fragmented.

Furthermore, the object of the mind is not a sign (signifier and signified) but only a signified. the object of the mind is atemporal, aspatial, amaterial. As such, it is also aprocedural, aquality, arelational.

Since signifiers (word-form) are arbitrary to the signified the sign is its own system different to the experiential system (physical reality) which is the relationship between objects of the mind and physical reality (experience).

Objects of the minds, in this construct, are non-existent “objects”. Only physical objects are real objects in the ontological sense. Objects of the mind are motivated by physical objects on the one hand and other objects of the mind on the other.

Signifiers are motivated by the objects of the mind, and in turn, indirectly motivated by the physical objects.

Discourse (that is, language) is last in this chain of events which can be called this being.